Sorry, but I don't understand which is the right sentence :
this one assuming that there is a special process with a "special driver"
fvdw wrote:The connection made via back port usb uses a special drivers and does not mount the partition in the usual way. In any case if the shared folders partition is connected via back port usb (assuming this is possible) then it will not be available via LAN...
or this one :
Jocko wrote:No, it's the normal behavior of all files system !
As I understand, when you connect the USB port, the LNS2 is recognised as a USB storage and the filesystem (actually FAT only) is normally mounted on your host PC(any). Before that, you have to create this FAT partition (which lowers the disk space) on the LNS2; then to have to copy the content from the FAT to the ext3 "public" partition. As you know, such ext3 partition (and FAT also) could be directly and easy mounted on any linux host (or any PC using a linux live CD) via the USB port. So for a linux user, the process could be far shorter and space saving. Surely for security, better to disconnect the LAN. Why not ?
Am I wrong somewhere ? Thanks